📖 The AI Tool Bible

Cody vs Cursor

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

 
Cody
Coding
Cursor
Coding
TaglineSourcegraph's AI coding assistant — codebase-aware via their search index.AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE.
CategoryCodingCoding
PricingFreemium· Free; Pro $9/mo; Enterprise customFreemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo
ModelClaude / GPT / Mixtral (configurable)Claude / GPT (configurable)
Editorial score8.0 / 109.5 / 10
Use cases
enterprisemonoreposcode search
codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE
Pros
  • Excellent for huge monorepos
  • Sourcegraph index is unmatched
  • Enterprise-grade privacy
  • Free tier
  • Best-in-class multi-file edits
  • Choice of underlying models
  • Composer agent is genuinely useful
  • Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Cons
  • Most value unlocked on Sourcegraph itself
  • Solo dev value smaller than Cursor
  • Heavier than vanilla VS Code
  • Pricing creeping up
  • Some extensions lag VS Code
Websitesourcegraph.comcursor.com
Pick Cody if
  • ✅ Excellent for huge monorepos
  • ✅ Sourcegraph index is unmatched
  • ✅ Enterprise-grade privacy
  • ✅ Free tier
Pick Cursor if
  • ✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
  • ✅ Choice of underlying models
  • ✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
  • ✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Compare a different pair →