📖 The AI Tool Bible

Capacity vs Cursor

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

 
Capacity
Coding
Cursor
Coding
TaglineAI app builder that generates full-stack React + Express + SQLite apps from natural language specs.AI-first VS Code fork — chat, edit, and agentic coding in one IDE.
CategoryCodingCoding
PricingFreemium· Free tier; usage-based credits that never expireFreemium· Free hobby; Pro $20/mo; Business $40/mo
ModelMulti-modelClaude / GPT (configurable)
Editorial score—9.5 / 10
Use cases
app-prototypingmvp-builderno-code-developmentfull-stack-generationmobile-app-generation
codingrefactorsagentic editsIDE
Pros
  • Generates a real Express + SQLite backend, not just a frontend mock
  • Spec Mode pushes you to plan before generating, reducing slop output
  • Full code ownership with GitHub export and direct download
  • Credit-based pricing with no expiry suits intermittent use
  • Covers both web (React) and mobile (React Native) from one prompt
  • Best-in-class multi-file edits
  • Choice of underlying models
  • Composer agent is genuinely useful
  • Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Cons
  • Opinionated stack — no Postgres, Next.js, or serverless options
  • Smaller ecosystem than Lovable, Bolt, or v0
  • Credit costs for non-trivial apps can climb quickly
  • SQLite default limits production scale without manual migration
  • Heavier than vanilla VS Code
  • Pricing creeping up
  • Some extensions lag VS Code
Websitecapacity.socursor.com
Pick Capacity if
  • ✅ Generates a real Express + SQLite backend, not just a frontend mock
  • ✅ Spec Mode pushes you to plan before generating, reducing slop output
  • ✅ Full code ownership with GitHub export and direct download
  • ✅ Credit-based pricing with no expiry suits intermittent use
Pick Cursor if
  • ✅ Best-in-class multi-file edits
  • ✅ Choice of underlying models
  • ✅ Composer agent is genuinely useful
  • ✅ Tab completion is faster than Copilot
Compare a different pair →