Amp (Sourcegraph) vs Replit Agent

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

	Amp (Sourcegraph) Coding	Replit Agent Coding
Tagline	Frontier coding agent from Sourcegraph with pass-through model pricing	Build & deploy a full app from a single prompt.
Category	Coding	Coding
Pricing	Freemium· Pay-as-you-go with $5 minimum credit purchase, zero markup on provider API costs; Enterprise tier from $1,000 USD minimum with SSO/SAML, zero data retention, cost controls, and MCP allowlisting.	Freemium· Free credits; Core $20/mo; Teams $35/mo
Model	GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT Image 2 (frontier multi-model)	Multi-model (Claude / GPT configurable)
Editorial score	8.4 / 10	8.7 / 10
Use cases	Multi-file refactors across large repositoriesAgentic code generation with subagent parallelismAutomated code review with custom rulesRemote background coding tasks monitored from mobileDeep reasoning on architectural or debugging problemsCross-repo code search via LibrarianCustom tool integration via MCPiOS and cross-platform app scaffoldingData-flow diagram and documentation generation	prototypesinternal toolsfull-stack agent
Pros	Zero-markup pass-through pricing on top-tier models keeps costs honest and predictable Access to frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8) without artificial token caps Rich agentic toolkit: Oracle reasoning, Librarian code search, Painter image gen, subagents Broad IDE coverage including VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Neovim, and Zed Remote agent execution from web and mobile with passkey auth is genuinely useful for long jobs MCP support and AGENTS.md files make it extensible and project-aware Enterprise tier offers SSO/SAML, zero data retention, and per-user cost controls	One-prompt → live app Auto-deploys Great for non-engineers Self-corrects errors
Cons	Pay-as-you-go with no flat cap means costs can spike on large-context or agentic runs Frontier-model focus is expensive compared to cheaper coding assistants No indication of an open-source client or public API for programmatic integration Steeper learning curve than simple autocomplete tools; assumes agent-literate users $1,000 minimum for Enterprise tier is a high floor for smaller teams wanting SSO	Quality drops on complex apps Iteration loop slower than local IDE
Website	ampcode.com	replit.com

Pick Amp (Sourcegraph) if

✅ Zero-markup pass-through pricing on top-tier models keeps costs honest and predictable
✅ Access to frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8) without artificial token caps
✅ Rich agentic toolkit: Oracle reasoning, Librarian code search, Painter image gen, subagents
✅ Broad IDE coverage including VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Neovim, and Zed

Pick Replit Agent if

✅ One-prompt → live app
✅ Auto-deploys
✅ Great for non-engineers
✅ Self-corrects errors

Compare a different pair →