📖 The AI Tool Bible

Amp (Sourcegraph) vs GitHub Copilot

A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.

 
Amp (Sourcegraph)
Coding
GitHub Copilot
Coding
TaglineFrontier coding agent from Sourcegraph with pass-through model pricingThe original AI pair programmer, now with chat and agents.
CategoryCodingCoding
PricingFreemium· Pay-as-you-go with $5 minimum credit purchase, zero markup on provider API costs; Enterprise tier from $1,000 USD minimum with SSO/SAML, zero data retention, cost controls, and MCP allowlisting.Paid· Free for individuals; $10/mo Pro; $19/mo Business
ModelGPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, GPT Image 2 (frontier multi-model)GPT / Claude / OpenAI o-series (configurable)
Editorial score8.4 / 109.1 / 10
Use cases
Multi-file refactors across large repositoriesAgentic code generation with subagent parallelismAutomated code review with custom rulesRemote background coding tasks monitored from mobileDeep reasoning on architectural or debugging problemsCross-repo code search via LibrarianCustom tool integration via MCPiOS and cross-platform app scaffoldingData-flow diagram and documentation generation
autocompletechatPR reviewagents
Pros
  • Zero-markup pass-through pricing on top-tier models keeps costs honest and predictable
  • Access to frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8) without artificial token caps
  • Rich agentic toolkit: Oracle reasoning, Librarian code search, Painter image gen, subagents
  • Broad IDE coverage including VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Neovim, and Zed
  • Remote agent execution from web and mobile with passkey auth is genuinely useful for long jobs
  • MCP support and AGENTS.md files make it extensible and project-aware
  • Enterprise tier offers SSO/SAML, zero data retention, and per-user cost controls
  • Excellent JetBrains + VS Code support
  • Tight GitHub PR integration
  • Now offers multiple model choices
  • Free tier for individuals
Cons
  • Pay-as-you-go with no flat cap means costs can spike on large-context or agentic runs
  • Frontier-model focus is expensive compared to cheaper coding assistants
  • No indication of an open-source client or public API for programmatic integration
  • Steeper learning curve than simple autocomplete tools; assumes agent-literate users
  • $1,000 minimum for Enterprise tier is a high floor for smaller teams wanting SSO
  • UX less integrated than Cursor
  • Multi-file edits are catching up but not yet leading
Websiteampcode.comgithub.com
Pick Amp (Sourcegraph) if
  • ✅ Zero-markup pass-through pricing on top-tier models keeps costs honest and predictable
  • ✅ Access to frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8) without artificial token caps
  • ✅ Rich agentic toolkit: Oracle reasoning, Librarian code search, Painter image gen, subagents
  • ✅ Broad IDE coverage including VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains, Neovim, and Zed
Pick GitHub Copilot if
  • ✅ Excellent JetBrains + VS Code support
  • ✅ Tight GitHub PR integration
  • ✅ Now offers multiple model choices
  • ✅ Free tier for individuals
Compare a different pair →