Agno (formerly Phidata) vs LangGraph
A side-by-side look at pricing, capabilities, pros, cons, and our editorial scores.
Agno (formerly Phidata) Agents | LangGraph Agents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source Python framework for building multi-agent systems, paired with a production runtime that ships in your own cloud. | Stateful, graph-based agent orchestration from LangChain. |
| Category | Agents | Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium· Framework free/OSS; AgentOS paid (see pricing page) | Freemium· Free open-source; LangGraph Platform paid |
| Model | Multi-model | BYO (Claude / GPT / open) |
| Editorial score | — | 8.8 / 10 |
| Use cases | stateful agentshuman-in-loopproduction | |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Website | www.agno.com | www.langchain.com |
Pick Agno (formerly Phidata) if
- ✅ Open-source framework with 40K+ GitHub stars and active community
- ✅ Supports 30+ model providers, so no lock-in to one LLM vendor
- ✅ AgentOS runs in your own cloud — good for regulated data
- ✅ Interops with LangGraph, DSPy, and Claude Agent SDK
Pick LangGraph if
- ✅ Reliable, debuggable agent graphs
- ✅ Built-in persistence + HITL
- ✅ Production-grade
- ✅ Tight LangSmith integration